B. Palicova
To Win
T. Korpatsch
To Win
Magali Kempen vs Barbora Palicova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W W L L
Form
L W L L L W W W L WHead-2-Head: Kempen 2 - 0 Palicova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Kempen winning 4 and Palicova winning 0. The last match between Kempen and Palicova was at the W50 Edgbaston, 10-02-2024, Final, I.hard with Magali Kempen getting the victory 6-3 7-6(6).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Magali Kempen | 2 |
| Barbora Palicova | 0 |
W50 Edgbaston(10-02-2024)
6
3
7
6
| Kempen | Stats | Palicova |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (9-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 827 | Ranking | 193 |
| 191 | Highest Rank | 179 |
| 27 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 4 |
| 63% (262-156) | Career Total W/L | 60% (173-113) |
| $2,000 | Career Prize Money | $128,955 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Magali Kempen
Player
Barbora Palicova
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Barbora Palicova
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 13 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:16:30 | Average Match Time | 1:16:30 |
| 66% (71/107) | 1st Serve % | 59% (70/119) |
| 77% (55/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (41/70) |
| 61% (22/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (23/49) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 46% (55/119) | Return Points Win % | 28% (30/107) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Magali Kempen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vivian Wolff
Player
Magali Kempen
70%
(
87 of
125)
1st Serve %
74%
(
71 of
96)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Lara Schmidt
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Magali Kempen
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
7
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Magali Kempen
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Elena Jamshidi
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Magali Kempen
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Barbora Palicova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Alina Granwehr
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Barbora Palicova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
117)
101
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Andrea Palazon
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Barbora Palicova
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Urszula Radwanska
Player
Barbora Palicova
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Barbora Palicova
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Valeriia Artemeva
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Barbora Palicova
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (262/156) | Win/Loss | 60% (173/113) |
| 61% (588/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (378/277) |
| 55% (4813/3917) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3246/2760) |
| 66% (129/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (23/23) |
| 57% (73/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (82/50) |
| 66% (58/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (67/39) |
| 33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 724 | Aces Total | 415 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1458 | Total Double Faults | 1111 |
| 1:18:11 | Average Match Time | 1:35:57 |
| 506.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.15 |
| 68% (15475/22727) | 1st Serve % | 65% (11971/18422) |
| 64% (9848/15475) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7417/11971) |
| 45% (3277/7262) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2924/6451) |
| 50% (1476/2946) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1180/2503) |
| 47% (10862/23108) | Return Points Win % | 47% (8746/18555) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (116/90) | Challenger W/L | 61% (140/90) |
| 72% (145/57) | Futures W/L | 71% (25/10) |
| 63% (261/413) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (169/280) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (43/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (39/70) |
| 50% (64/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (52/89) |
| 86% (263/227) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (167/143) |
| 14% (263/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (167/22) |
| 23% (155/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (118/28) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
